1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 201 N.J.
  5. 201 N.J. Super. 105 (1985)
 

IN RE APPLICATION OF JOHN MADIN/LORDLAND DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL

201 N.J. Super. 105 (1985)

492 A.2d 1034

IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF JOHN MADIN/LORDLAND DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL FOR PINELANDS DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. PLANNING BOARD OF HAMILTON TOWNSHIP, ATLANTIC COUNTY, APPELLANT, v. NEW JERSEY PINELANDS COMMISSION, JOHN MADIN/LORDLAND DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL AND CASTLEHARD DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL, RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 9, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William C. Todd III argued the cause for appellant Egg Harbor Township Planning Board (Tort, Jacobs, Todd & Bruso, attorneys; A. Ralph Perone, of counsel).

Michael J. Fitzgerald argued the cause for appellant Hamilton Township Planning Board (Previti, Todd, Gemmel, Fitzgerald & Nugent, attorneys).

John M. Van Dalen, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent New Jersey Pinelands Commission (Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; James J. Ciancia, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).

Nelson C. Johnson argued the cause for respondents John Madin/Lordland Development International and Castlehard Development International (Bertman, Johnson and Sahli, attorneys).

Before Judges MICHELS, PETRELLA and BAIME.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PETRELLA, J.A.D.

These consolidated appeals involve challenges by the planning boards of the Townships of Egg Harbor (Egg Harbor) and Hamilton (Hamilton) to the action of the New Jersey Pinelands Commission (Commission) denying them standing and an opportunity to be heard or to object to development approvals granted by the Commission's staff in their respective communities. We hold that the planning boards have standing under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases