Judgment affirmed.
Defendant was found guilty of firing a shotgun towards a group of people. He contends on appeal that the evidence against him was insufficient to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
"The standard for reviewing the legal sufficiency of evidence in a criminal case is whether `after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
