STATE v. PIMA COUNTY ADULT PROBATION DEPT.

2 CA-CIV 5436.

147 Ariz. 146 (1985)

708 P.2d 1337

The STATE of Arizona, Crossdefendant/Appellant, v. The PIMA COUNTY ADULT PROBATION DEPARTMENT: Stephen C. Emslie, Charles R. Moffett, William G. Johnson, Robert E. Long, as employees of the Pima County Adult Probation Department, Crossclaimants/Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A.

October 31, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert K. Corbin, Atty. Gen. by A. Glenn Reesing, Phoenix, for crossdefendant/appellant.

Jones, Dickerman, Nuckolls, Edwards & Smith, P.C. by Richard M. Rollman, Tucson, for crossclaimants/appellees.


OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

This appeal arises out of a summary judgment in which the trial court held that probation officers are officers, agents and employees of the judicial department of the state and are entitled to insurance coverage under A.R.S. § 41-621.

On August 30, 1982, various minor plaintiffs initiated a tort action against the Pima County Adult Probation Department, four named adult probation officers, the State of Arizona and Pima...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases