1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 167 Cal.App.3d
  5. 167 Cal.App.3d 110 (1985)
 

PEOPLE v. HOPKINS

Docket No. A026495.

167 Cal.App.3d 110 (1985)

212 Cal. Rptr. 888

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RONALD HOPKINS, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

April 22, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Randy Montesano, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Ronald E. Niver and Eugene W. Kaster, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

LOW, P.J.

In this case, we hold that a sentencing court may not make dual use of facts for different enhancements. We also hold that Penal Code section 1170.1, subdivision (e)1 prohibits more than one of three enhancements to be imposed for a single offense except for attempted or actual robbery, rape or burglary.

Defendant Ronald Hopkins was convicted after a court trial of the following...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases