SKRYHA v. PENNSYLVANIA NAT. MUT. CAS. INS. CO.


206 N.J. Super. 66 (1985)

501 A.2d 1021

GLORIA SKRYHA, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF WALTER SKRYHA, DECEASED, AND GLORIA SKRYHA, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUAL CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 6, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael R. Justin, attorney for appellant.

Shackleton, Hazeltine & Buczynski, attorneys for respondent (James Den Uyl, on the letter-brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, DREIER and GRUCCIO.


The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, P.J.A.D.

This appeal poses a novel question respecting the interrelationship of benefits afforded by the Workers' Compensation Law, N.J.S.A. 34:15-1, et seq., and the Automobile Reparation Reform Act (no fault law), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1, et seq. More specifically, the issue before us is whether the collateral source rule of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-6 bars the recovery of survivor's essential...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases