BLACK v. BOARD OF REVISION OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY

No. 84-236.

16 Ohio St. 3d 11 (1985)

BLACK ET AL., TRUSTEES, APPELLEES AND CROSS-APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF REVISION OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY ET AL.; CLEVELAND BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 27, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Arter & Hadden, Mr. Curtiss L. Isler and Mr. Jacob I. Rosenbaum, for appellees and cross-appellants.

Messrs. Armstrong, Gordon & Mitchell, Mr. Timothy J. Armstrong and Mr. William Mitchell, for appellant and cross-appellee.


WRIGHT, J.

The issues presented by this appeal are whether the common pleas court abused its discretion in refusing to conduct a trial de novo or erred in its valuation of UCB's property and whether a discriminatory level of assessment was applied. We hold that the court of common pleas did not abuse its discretion in disallowing a trial de novo. We further hold that the court's method of valuation and application of a uniform rate of assessment were...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases