MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, ETC. v. BOECK

No. 83-675.

127 Wis.2d 127 (1985)

377 N.W.2d 605

MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. George V. BOECK, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided December 11, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the defendant-appellant-petitioner there were briefs by Richard S. Florsheim, Brian W. McGrath and Foley & Lardner, Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Florsheim.

For the plaintiff-respondent there was a brief by James G. Howard, Paul R. Erickson and Zirbel, Howard & Malone, S.C., Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Erickson.


STEINMETZ, J.

The issues decided in this case are: (1) Does a commodities broker who undertakes to provide investment information and counsel to a customer with a nondiscretionary account, and who later learns that previously given information has been changed or was incorrect, have a fiduciary duty to disclose the latest information before the customer invests through the same broker in reliance on the original disclosure?

(2) Under what circumstances can...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases