PLEASE CO. v. HUNTINGTON NATL. BANK

No. 84AP-466.

24 Ohio App. 3d 227 (1985)

PEASE COMPANY, APPELLEE, v. HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK ET AL., APPELLANTS; CITICORP PERSON-TO-PERSON ET AL., APPELLEES.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Franklin County.

Decided October 3, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lucas, Prendergast, Albright, Gibson & Newman, Richard C. Brahm, John C. Lucas and James L. Todd, for appellee Pease Co.

Milton A. Puckett and Stephen M. Connor, for appellants and for defendant-appellee R.K. Mathews & Associates, Inc.

Cameron & Belskis Co., L.P.A., and James W. Wheeler, for defendant appellee Citicorp.

Michael Miller, prosecuting attorney, and Phillip M. Walther, for defendant-appellee Dana G. Rinehart.


MOYER, J.

This matter is before us on appeal by defendants-appellants, Gary W. and Bonita A. Burchfield ("the Burchfields") and the Huntington National Bank ("Huntington"), from a summary judgment by the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County in favor of plaintiff-appellee, Pease Company ("Pease").

The judgment ordered that plaintiff's mortgage had priority over a lien of defendant Huntington; dismissed defendant Burchfields' counterclaim against plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases