Per Curiam.
The Departmental Disciplinary Committee has moved for an order punishing respondent for contempt with fines or imprisonment or both; an order disbarring him for his failure to comply with the June 28, 1983 order of this court suspending him from practice; and imposition of the costs of this motion upon respondent since the same was occasioned by his "wilful and contemptuous disregard of the order suspending him from practice." Respondent has defaulted...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.