1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 206 N.J.
  5. 206 N.J. Super. 39 (1985)
 

PRUSECKI v. BRANCH MOTOR EXP.

206 N.J. Super. 39 (1985)

501 A.2d 1006

MATTHEW PRUSECKI, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. BRANCH MOTOR EXPRESS, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 3, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sheldon Schiffman argued the cause for appellant (Dwyer, Connell & Lisbona, attorneys, Sheldon Schiffman, of counsel and on the brief).

Jack Mandell argued the cause for respondent (Balk, Balk and Mandell, P.A. attorneys, Jack Mandell, on the brief).

Before Judges O'BRIEN, SIMPSON and SCALERA.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SCALERA, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

The employer appeals from a judgment entered in the Division of Workers' Compensation that determined the petitioner to be 25% partially permanently disabled, 20% as a result of a myocardial infarction, and 5% for traumatic anxiety and cardiophobia. We address here the recent statutory amendment relating to coronary and cardiovascular...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases