Per Curiam.
Respondent was admitted to practice by this court on October 16, 1963. In this proceeding to discipline him for professional misconduct, the petitioner moves to confirm the report of the Special Referee and respondent cross-moves to "affirm" that part of the report that recommends dismissal of "charge three" and to limit the imposition of any penalty to censure.
The Special Referee sustained the following charges of misconduct: converting moneys...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
