MAXWELL CO. v. PUB. UTIL. COMM.

Nos. 84-1446 and 84-1923.

18 Ohio St. 3d 217 (1985)

MAXWELL COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. (TWO CASES.)

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 17, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stiverson & Alden, and James R. Stiverson, for appellant.

Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, Robert S. Tongren and John L. Shatter in case Nos. 84-1446 and 84-1923, and David C. Champion in case No. 84-1923, for appellee, Public Utilities Commission.

Berry & Spurlock Co., L.P.A., and Michael Spurlock, for intervening appellees Condor Express, Inc. and United States Transportation, Inc. in case No. 84-1446.


Per Curiam.

A common gravamen in each of these actions concerns the practical consequence of the agency agreements between the transferors and transferees of the certificates. Maxwell argues that these agreements act to "split" the operating certificates, allowing both transferor and transferee in each case to operate pursuant to the authority of the respective certificates. This practice was found to be unlawful in Braddock v. Pub. Util. Comm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases