1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 101 N.J.
  5. 101 N.J. 132 (1985)
 

STATE v. BRUNSON

101 N.J. 132 (1985)

501 A.2d 145

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LAWRENCE BRUNSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 12, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michele A. Adubato, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for appellant (Thomas S. Smith, Jr., attorney; Acting Public Defender).

Nancy M. Falivena, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by STEIN, J.

In this case appellant contests the validity of the procedure employed by the trial court for the exercise of peremptory challenges. Appellant was entitled to twenty peremptory challenges and the State to twelve. Rather than alternate the exercise of peremptory challenges between the State and appellant, the trial court required appellant to exercise two challenges and the State one challenge for eight successive...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases