1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 774 F.2d
  5. 774 F.2d 1482 (1985)
 

UNITED STATES v. IPPOLITO

No. 84-5257.

774 F.2d 1482 (1985)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis John IPPOLITO, Michael Contino, Irving Schwartz, William Darnold, Lawrence Miller, Thomas Arrants, and Arthur Joseph Natoli, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided October 29, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Henderson, Richard Small, Dept. of Justice, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Richard Sherman, Los Angeles, Cal., James Twitty, Beverly Hills, Cal., Arthur Mabry, Harland Braun, Samuel Jackson, Jackson & Wikle, Los Angeles, Cal., Milton E. Grusmark, Miami, Fla., for defendants-appellees.

Before GOODWIN, FLETCHER and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges.

FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

The United States appeals from the district court's suppression of information gained through wiretaps. The district court relied on Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978), to hold that false and misleading information in government affidavits concerning the necessity of the wiretaps required suppression of the information derived from the wiretaps. We affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases