ARMSTRONG v. RICHLAND CLINIC

No. 6244-9-III.

42 Wn. App. 181 (1985)

709 P.2d 1237

ROBERT F. ARMSTRONG, Appellant, v. THE RICHLAND CLINIC, INC., P.S., Respondent.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.

November 19, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David E. Williams and Critchlow & Williams, for appellant.

Daryl Jonson and Cowan, Walker, Jonson & Moore, for respondent.


MUNSON, J.

Robert Francis Armstrong appeals a judgment entered upon a jury verdict, holding his discharge from employment was not the result of discrimination. He contends: (1) the trial court erred in withdrawing certain claims from the jury; (2) the court erred in refusing his proposed instruction placing the burden of disproving discriminatory discharge upon the defendant; and (3) he was entitled to a new trial because of certain misconduct of the bailiff and the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases