1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 8 N.J.
  5. 8 N.J. Tax 212 (1985)
 

POWDER MILL I ASSOCS. v. HAMILTON TP.

8 N.J. Tax 212 (1985)

POWDER MILL I ASSOCIATES AND POWDER MILL II ASSOCIATES, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 3, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Salvatore Perillo, attorney for appellants.

Blatt, Mairone, Biel, Zlotnick, Feinberg & Griffith, attorneys for respondent (Mark Biel and Glenn E. Fuhrman on the brief).

Before Judges FRITZ and LONG.

PER CURIAM.

The taxpayers challenge the dismissal of their tax appeals on procedural grounds in the Tax Court. We affirm.

Judge Rimm dismissed these appeals because of the failure of plaintiffs to comply with the rules of the Tax Court and the pretrial order concerning the exchange of appraisals as well as for their being unprepared to proceed on a postponed trial date. Plaintiffs do not deny these derelictions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases