HAMNER v. RIOS

No. 84-6397.

769 F.2d 1404 (1985)

Floyd HAMNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Manuel RIOS, Manuel Arredondo, Roger Perez, Yolanda Coba, and Charles Ellis, Jr., Individually and as Members of the City Council of the City of Coachella, the City of Coachella, a Municipal Corporation, John Rios, Fire Chief, Raul Romero, City Manager, Bill Vargus, Building Inspector, Henry Tasaka, Director of Planning, and Arthur Valdez, Building Inspector, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided August 28, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edison P. McDaniels, San Bernardino, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Ladell Muhlestein, John A. Daly, Chase, Rotchford, Drukker & Bogust, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Before ALARCON and POOLE, Circuit Judges, and ORRICK, District Judge.


POOLE, Circuit Judge:

Floyd Hamner appeals the denial of his motion for attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988. In this appeal, we consider whether the district judge abused her discretion by denying Hamner's motion for attorney's fees, where he and his counsel had executed a contingent fee agreement. For reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand. The existence of a contingent fee agreement is not itself a sufficient reason to deny attorney's fees.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases