1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 172 Cal.App.3d
  5. 172 Cal.App.3d 45 (1985)
 

PEOPLE v. CHEW

Docket No. F004630.

172 Cal.App.3d 45 (1985)

217 Cal. Rptr. 805

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RANDY RAY CHEW, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

September 10, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Gretchen Dumas, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, Chaset & Dumas and Laurence G. Chaset for Defendant and Appellant.

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, and James T. McNally, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

WOOLPERT, Acting P.J.

When the appellate process has returned a defendant from prison to the trial court on remand for resentencing or for further proceedings which justify a new prison sentence, what statutory credits should the sentencing court compute for the time already spent in prison? (1a) We find the time spent in prison between the initial sentencing and resentencing or a new sentence is properly characterized...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases