1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 763 F.2d
  5. 763 F.2d 1406 (1985)
 

IN RE DURDEN

Appeal No. 85-601.

763 F.2d 1406 (1985)

In re John A. DURDEN, Jr., and Arthur P. Kurtz, Jr.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 10, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert C. Brown, Group Patent Counsel, Danbury, Conn., argued for appellants.

Harris A. Pitlick, Associate Sol., U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Arlington, Va., argued for appellee. With him on the brief were Joseph F. Nakamura, Sol., and John W. Dewhirst, Associate Sol., Washington, D.C.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, RICH, Circuit Judge, and NICHOLS, Senior Circuit Judge.

RICH, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals (board) affirming the examiner's rejection of the single claim remaining in application serial No. 148,557, filed May 9, 1980, for a process of making certain compounds1 as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in view of a U.S. patent to Punja, No. 3,843,669. We affirm.

Background

Quoting appellants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases