1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 707 P.2d
  5. 707 P.2d 1294 (1985)
 

VAN HORN v. SENIOR SERVICES DIVISION

A34122.

707 P.2d 1294 (1985)

Jacqueline S. VAN HORN, v. SENIOR SERVICES DIVISION of the State of Oregon, and Richard C. Ladd, Administrator.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted October 14, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Penny L. Davis, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief was Amy Veranth, Portland.

Linda J. DeVries, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is a proceeding brought pursuant to ORS 183.400 to determine the validity of two temporary administrative rules adopted by the state Senior Services Division (Division). Petitioner argues that the Division's statement of justification for emergency rule promulgation, as required by ORS 183.335(5),1 is legally inadequate. We conclude that the statement is minimally adequate.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases