UNITED STATES of America,
v.
Yin Poy LOUIE, Bing Far Yuen, Shiu Ping Wu, Robert Hu, Peter Chin, Wai Ho Tsang, Bok Min Paul Wong, David Wong, Jimmy Hsueh, Peter Chan, Jackie Mooi, Lenny Chow, Danny Tom, George Tom, Frankie Mooi, William Chin, Paul Wong, Daniel Lee, Steven Yau, Robert Hsu, Torran Chang, Kwai Ming Chow, Perry Hoo, Pak Tse, and Bing Yie Chan, Defendants.
United States District Court, S.D. New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 24, 1985.
December 24, 1985.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Rudolph W. Giuliani, U.S. Atty., S.D. N.Y., New York City, for the U.S.; Anne T. Vitale, Asst. U.S. Atty., Nancy Ryan, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., of counsel.
Olshan, Grundman & Frome, New York City, for defendant Yin Poy Louie; Elyse S. Goldweber, of counsel.
Susan Kellman, New York City, for defendant Peter Chin.
Roger Schwarz, New York City, for defendant Wai Ho Tsang.
Agulnick & Gogel, New York City, for Defendant Paul Wong; Barry W. Agulnick, of counsel.
Lecci, Wolin & Wolin, Hicksville, N.Y., for defendant David Wong; Jerold Wolin, of counsel.
Baden, Kramer, Huffman & Brodsky, P.C., New York City, for defendant Peter Chan; Richard L. Huffman, of counsel.
Lewis & Fiore, New York City, for defendant Jackie Mooi; David L. Lewis, of counsel.
Norman Corenthal, New York City, for defendant Lenny Chow.
Rochman, Platzer & Fallick, New York City, for defendant Danny Tom; Barry Fallick, of counsel.
Freeman, Nooter & Ginsberg, Thomas H. Nooter, New York City, for defendant Frankie Mooi.
Harry Batchelder, New York City, for defendant Steven Yau.
Jerry Tritz, New York City, for defendant Robert Hsu.
Thomas Liotti, Carle Place, N.Y., for defendant Torran Chang.
Emanual Moore, New York City, for defendant Kwai Ming Chow.
Daniel Noble, New York City, for defendant Perry Hoo.
Campos & Wojszwilo, New York City, for defendant Pak Tse; Richard Wojszwilo, of counsel.
David Cooper, New York City, for defendant William Chin.
Mathew J. Mari, New York City, for defendant Bing Yie Chan.
United States District Court, S.D. New York.
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Pretrial motions for severance, dismissal on the grounds of double jeopardy, and other relief were filed on behalf of certain of the defendants here and have been treated as having been made by all defendants similarly situated. Final submission and oral argument occurred on October 25, 1985. A review of the ninety-page indictment in light of these motions indicates that this action has been and promises to be a challenge for...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
