1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 622 F.Supp.
  5. 622 F.Supp. 1262 (1985)
 

UNITED STATES v. METROPOLITAN DISPOSAL CORP.

CR. No. 83-29-BU.

622 F.Supp. 1262 (1985)

UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner, v. METROPOLITAN DISPOSAL CORPORATION, Respondent.

United States District Court, D. Oregon.

Amended Supplemental Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Filed October 29, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles H. Turner, U.S. Dist. Atty., Portland, Or., and Bernard M. Hollander, Antitrust Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Richard B. Cohen, Antitrust Div., Dept. of Justice, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.

John S. Ransom, Ransom, Blackman & Simson, Portland, Or., for respondent.

ON MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL

JAMES M. BURNS, District Judge.

Respondent (MDC), pursuant to Rule 29, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, renews its motion for judgment of acquittal. MDC contends that its conduct could not have been found to be "willful" as necessary for conviction in a criminal contempt action. Respondent's motion is DENIED.

On December 6, 1984, I denied respondent's initial Rule 29 motion for judgment of acquittal. I then...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases