KING v. GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION

83-07284; CA A33137.

709 P.2d 1156 (1985)

76 Or.App. 557

In the matter of the Compensation of Danny C. KING, Claimant. Danny C. King, Petitioner, v. GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, Self-Insured Employer, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 27, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert K. Udziela, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. On brief were Peter W. Preston and Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O'Leary & Conboy, Portland.

Jerry K. Brown, McMinnville, argued the cause for respondent. With him on brief were Cummins, Cummins, Brown & Goodman, P.C., McMinnville.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and WARDEN and NEWMAN, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

In this workers' compensation case the referee modified the determination order by deleting an award of permanent partial disability on the basis that a complicated medical question was involved requiring expert testimony of impairment, which the referee found to be lacking. The Board affirmed. We disagree. A physician's report is not indispensable, nor is it required in an "extent of disability" claim. Garbutt v. SAIF, 297 Or. 148...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases