1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 758 F.2d
  5. 758 F.2d 1086 (1985)
 

JAIMES v. TOLEDO METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY

Nos. 83-3443, 83-3472 and 83-3561.

758 F.2d 1086 (1985)

Josie JAIMES, Tomas Gonzales, Clarence Turner, and Patricia Davis, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. TOLEDO METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY; John Landry; Frank B. Daig, Jr.; Dorothy Dennis; John Chadwell; Carlton Siegel, Maurine Layson; United States Department of Housing & Urban Development; Samuel R. Pierce, Secretary of HUD; Alfred C. Moran, Administrator of HUD; Judith Y. Brachman, Director of HUD, Columbus, Ohio, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided March 25, 1985.

Rehearing Denied June 24, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William M. Connelly (LEAD), Kevin E. Joyce (argued), Connelly, Soutar & Jackson; Charles A. Matuszynski, Toledo, Ohio, for Lucas Metropolitan Housing Authority.

Anthony J. Steinmeyer, Michael Kemmel, Marc Johnston, Dept. of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, D.C., Patrick J. Foley, Asst. U.S. Atty., Toledo, Ohio, Edward G. Weil, Anthony J. Ciccone, Jr. (argued), Office of General Counsel, Dept. of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, D.C., for HUD.

Glen C. Galbreath (argued), Michael Warren, A.B.L.E., Inc., Joseph R. Tafelski, Toledo, Ohio, Janet E. LaBella, Bruce Gelber, National Committee Against Discrimination in Housing, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before LIVELY, Chief Judge, WELLFORD, Circuit Judge, and GIBBONS, District Judge.

WELLFORD, Circuit Judge.

I.

This action was filed on February 15, 1974, with the plaintiffs, members of minority groups, alleging violations of the fifth, thirteenth and fourteenth amendments, the Civil Rights Act of 1870 (the "Civil Rights Act"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1982, and 1983, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VI"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000d-2000d-6, Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 ("Title VIII"), 42 U.S.C. §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases