1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 763 F.2d
  5. 763 F.2d 1076 (1985)
 

CONTINENTAL CAS. CO. v. CITY OF RICHMOND

CA Nos. 84-1563, 84-1564.

763 F.2d 1076 (1985)

CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF RICHMOND, a municipal corporation, et al., Defendant-Appellant and Mead Reinsurance Company, Defendant-in-Intervention-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided June 20, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary V. Dixon, Ross, Dixon & Masback, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee.

Timothy J. Murphy, Crosby, Heafey, Roach & May, Oakland, Cal., for City of Richmond.

Louis H. Castoria, Wilson, Elser, Edelman & Dicker, San Francisco, Cal., for Mead Reinsurance Co.

Before GOODWIN, POOLE, and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges.

POOLE, Circuit Judge:

Continental Casualty Company ("CNA" or the "Company") sought a declaratory judgment that an insurance policy it had issued to the City of Richmond, California, did not provide coverage for claims asserted in a civil rights and wrongful death action filed against Richmond by the three minor children of Willie Lee Drumgoole.

The district court granted summary judgment for CNA, finding that there were no genuine issues of material fact for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases