1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 696 P.2d
  5. 696 P.2d 1140 (1985)
 

ACKERLEY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. MULT. CO.

83-028, 83-034 and 83-051; CA A34195.

696 P.2d 1140 (1985)

72 Or.App. 617

ACKERLEY COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Washington Corporation, Petitioner, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY, a Home Rule Political Subdivision of the State of Oregon, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 20, 1985.

Reconsideration Denied May 10, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald Joe Willis, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Ridgway K. Foley, Jr., P.C., Mildred J. Carmack, and Schwabe, Williamson, Wyatt, Moore & Roberts, Portland.

Peter Kasting, Asst. County Counsel, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was John B. Leahy, County Counsel, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and WARDEN and NEWMAN, JJ.

RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Land Use Board of Appeals which rejected its constitutional and other challenges to Multnomah County Ordinance No. 365, as amended by Ordinances Nos. 369 and 376.1 The ordinance regulates outdoor advertising through billboards. Petitioner's principal contention is that the county's regulation of advertising that has only "commercial" content, when "noncommercial" outdoor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases