1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 696 P.2d
  5. 696 P.2d 1135 (1985)
 

PAHLE v. AFSD

2-2402-AM0881-4; CA A29479.

696 P.2d 1135 (1985)

72 Or.App. 606

Ronald J. PAHLE, Petitioner, v. ADULT AND FAMILY SERVICES DIVISION, Leo Hegstrom, Dir., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 20, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Susan Howard, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. On the briefs were Ann M. Hubard and Robert M. Atkinson, Salem.

Christine Chute, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before JOSEPH, C.J., and WARDEN and NEWMAN, JJ.

JOSEPH, Chief Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of a revised order on reconsideration by Adult and Family Services Division denying him Aid to Dependent Children benefits. He argues that the agency denied benefits on the basis of an agency rule that impermissibly conflicts with federal regulations. We reverse and remand for reconsideration.

Petitioner is a 22-year-old who was discharged from the Air Force because of a back problem. At the hearing to determine...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases