NICHOLS HILLS BANK v. McCOOL

No. 51168-3.

104 Wn.2d 78 (1985)

701 P.2d 1114

NICHOLS HILLS BANK, Appellant, v. RICHARD M. McCOOL, JR., ET AL, Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

June 27, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert T. Beattie, Jr. (of Bishop, Cunningham, Hartman & Beattie), for appellant.

George C. Nickum, Jr., for respondents.


DURHAM, J.

Nichols Hills Bank appeals from a trial court judgment dismissing its claim against the marital community of Richard McCool, Jr., and Carole Elaine McCool. The bank contends the trial court erred by finding that: (1) Carole McCool did not ratify, authorize or consent to a guaranty agreement signed by her husband, (2) the bank could not reach Richard McCool's one-half interest in the McCool community property, and (3) the guaranty agreement precluded the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases