BANISTER CONTINENTAL CORP v. NW PIPELINE CORP

81-6-745; CA A28212.

709 P.2d 1103 (1985)

BANISTER CONTINENTAL CORPORATION, Respondent-Cross-Appellant, v. NORTHWEST PIPELINE CORPORATION, Appellant-Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, In Banc.

Resubmitted February 6, 1985.

Decided November 14, 1985.

Reconsideration Denied January 10, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elizabeth T. Dunning, Salt Lake City, Utah, and James H. Clarke, Portland, argued the cause for appellant — cross-respondent. With them on the briefs were Watkiss & Campbell, Salt Lake City, Utah, and Corey, Byler & Rew, Pendleton, and Spears, Lubersky, Campbell, Bledsoe, Anderson & Young, Portland.

Arden E. Shenker, Portland, and Robert T. Mautz, Pendleton, argued the cause for respondent — cross-appellant. With them on the briefs were Lamar Tooze, Elizabeth A. Trainor and Tooze Kerr Marshall & Shenker, Portland, and Mautz, Hallman & Teicher, Pendleton.


Resubmitted In Banc February 6, 1985.

GILLETTE, Judge.

This is an action for damages for breach of two construction contracts. Defendant appeals from a judgment entered after a jury verdict in plaintiff's favor; plaintiff cross-appeals, seeking additional prejudgment interest. We affirm.

A detailed discussion of the facts is not required. In 1980, plaintiff and defendant entered into two contracts under which plaintiff would build 112 miles of natural...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases