1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 702 P.2d
  5. 702 P.2d 1098 (1985)
 

IN RE BRANDSNESS

Nos. OSB 82-14; SC S30591.

702 P.2d 1098 (1985)

299 Or. 420

In re Complaint as to the CONDUCT OF William BRANDSNESS, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided July 9, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel O'Leary, Portland, argued the cause for the accused. With him on the brief were Robert K. Udziela and Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O'Leahy & Conboy, Portland.

John P. Cooney, Medford, argued the cause for the Oregon State Bar. With him on the brief was George A. Riemer, Portland.

Before LENT, P.J., and LINDE, CAMPBELL, ROBERTS, CARSON and JONES, JJ., and PETERSON, C.J., by stipulation.

PER CURIAM.

In 1982,1 the Oregon State Bar filed a complaint against the accused alleging that his representation of the husband in a dissolution proceeding constituted a conflict of interest in violation of DR 5-105, because the accused formerly had represented both the husband and wife in business matters and in the execution of mutual wills.

BACKGROUND

On April 19, 1979, John Zingg retained the accused. Mr. Zingg,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases