TOTTEN v. NEW YORK LIFE INS. CO.

TC A8209-05575; CA A28617; SC S30836.

696 P.2d 1082 (1985)

298 Or. 765

Kristi A. TOTTEN, Petitioner On Review, v. NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO., a New York Corporation, Respondent On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc.

Decided March 6, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Emerson G. Fisher, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review.

Don G. Carter, Portland, argued the cause and filed the response for respondent on review. With him on the response was McEwen, Hanna, Gisvold & Rankin, and Robert D. Rankin, Portland.


CAMPBELL, Justice.

The sole issue in this petition for review is whether the term "any aircraft" in the exclusion clause of a life insurance policy includes a hang glider.1 We hold that a hang glider is included in the term "any aircraft."

In May 1980, Dale Totten purchased an insurance policy from the defendant, New York Life Insurance Co., insuring his life in the face amount of $25...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases