IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM DATED NOV. 13, 1984

No. 84 CV 4756.

616 F.Supp. 1159 (1985)

In re GRAND JURY SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM DATED NOVEMBER 13, 1984 (John Doe, Petitioner).

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

July 26, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence S. Goldman, New York City, for petitioner.

Edward A. McDonald, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Organized Crime Strike Force, Bruce Maffeo, Sp. Atty., Brooklyn, N.Y., for defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

Petitioner, one of two partners in a consulting firm, moves to quash a grand jury subpoena duces tecum. Fed.R.Crim.P. 17(c). On March 25, 1985, this Court held that the traditional rule of Bellis v. United States, 417 U.S. 85, 94 S.Ct. 2179, 40 L.Ed.2d 678 (1974), was not an automatic bar to petitioner's assertion of the Fifth Amendment in opposition to the subpoena...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases