WHEELER v. MARINE NAVIGATION SULPHUR CARRIERS

Nos. 84-2087(L), 84-2089 to 84-2101.

764 F.2d 1008 (1985)

James E. WHEELER, Appellant, v. MARINE NAVIGATION SULPHUR CARRIERS, INC., Appellee. William J. EDWARDS, Appellant, v. MARINE NAVIGATION SULPHUR CARRIERS, INC., Appellee. Gale YOUNG, Appellant, v. MARINE NAVIGATION SULPHUR CARRIERS, INC., Appellee. Charles E. SATTERFIELD, Appellant, v. MARINE NAVIGATION SULPHUR CARRIERS, INC., Appellee. John C. ZBIEGIEN, Appellant, v. MARINE NAVIGATION SULPHUR CARRIERS, INC., Appellee. Peter W. GEORGOPOULOS, Appellant, v. MARINE NAVIGATION SULPHUR CARRIERS, INC., Appellee. Dennis WILSON, Appellant, v. MARINE NAVIGATION SULPHUR CARRIERS, INC., Appellee. Henry J. WELLS, Appellant, v. MARINE NAVIGATION SULPHUR CARRIERS, INC., Appellee. Ezell MAYS, Appellant, v. MARINE NAVIGATION SULPHUR CARRIERS, INC., Appellee. Frank BANKS, Appellant, v. MARINE NAVIGATION SULPHUR CARRIERS, INC., Appellee. James TRIPP, Jr., Appellant, v. MARINE NAVIGATION SULPHUR CARRIERS, INC., Appellee. Ira CARTER, Appellant, v. MARINE NAVIGATION SULPHUR CARRIERS, INC., Appellee. Herbert KREBS, Appellant, v. MARINE NAVIGATION SULPHUR CARRIERS, INC., Appellee. James LYLE, Appellant, v. MARINE NAVIGATION SULPHUR CARRIERS, INC., Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided June 17, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marvin I. Barish, Philadelphia, Pa. (Adler, Barish, Daniels, Levin & Cheskoff, Philadelphia, Pa., C. Arthur Rutter, Jr., Breit, Rutter & Montagna, Norfolk, Va., on brief), for appellant.

Robert M. Hughes, III, Norfolk, Va. (John R. Crumpler, Jr., Seawell, Dalton, Hughes & Timms, Norfolk, Va., on brief), for appellee.

Before WINTER, Chief Judge, and SPROUSE and SNEEDEN, Circuit Judges.


HARRISON L. WINTER, Chief Judge:

Dissatisfied with their damage awards and, in the case of James E. Wheeler and Peter W. Georgopoulus, the judgment for defendant, plaintiffs, crew members of the S/T MARINE FLORIDIAN, appeal from the district court's final judgment, which, inter alia, denied their demands for jury trial of their personal injury actions brought under the Jones Act. The district court held that plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases