PER CURIAM.
The trial court found that appellee breached an exclusive sales agreement, but that (1) no profit losses could be attributed to the breach because appellant had no profit history and its alleged damages were thus too speculative, and (2) the breach did not absolve appellant of liability for an indebtedness incurred prior to the breach. The court's findings and conclusions will not be disturbed on either the main appeal or the cross-appeal because they...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
