COLUMBIA RIVER TELEVISION v. MULTNOMAH CO.

LUBA No. 84-016; CA A32193; SC S31303.

702 P.2d 1065 (1985)

299 Or. 325

COLUMBIA RIVER TELEVISION, Petitioner On Review, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY AND GREATER PORTLAND BROADCASTING CORP., Respondents On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Argued and Submitted March 6, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Susan M. Hammer, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner on review. On the petition and brief were Mark R. Feichtinger, David G. Ellis and Stoel, Rives, Boley, Fraser & Wyse, Portland.

Peter Kasting, Asst. County Counsel, Portland, waived appearance for respondent on review Multnomah County.

Stephen T. Janik, Portland, argued the cause for respondent on review Greater Portland Broadcasting Corp. With him on the response and supplemental response were Susan M. Quick, Jacob Tanzer and Ball, Janik & Novack, Portland. Susan M. Quick and Ball, Janik & Novack, Portland, were also on the brief.


CARSON, Justice.

Petitioner asks us to reverse the Court of Appeals' decision concluding that a rule of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA), rather than a local government's ordinance, determines when a local government's decision is "final" for the purposes of appeal. We reverse and remand to LUBA for decision on the merits.

The resolution of this case lies in the interrelationship and potential conflict of a statute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases