McDONALD v. BARLOW

No. 14406.

705 P.2d 1056 (1985)

109 Idaho 101

Frances McDONALD, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross Respondent, v. Kimber Ray BARLOW, Defendant-Respondent, Cross Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

September 3, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John C. Hepworth (argued) and John T. Lezamiz, Hepworth, Nungester & Felton, Twin Falls, for plaintiff-appellant, cross respondent.

Roger D. Ling (argued) and Steven Ross, Ling, Nielsen & Robinson, Rupert, for defendant-respondent, cross-appellant.


ON REHEARING

This opinion supercedes our prior opinion issued January 24, 1985, which is hereby withdrawn.

WALTERS, Chief Justice.

Several months after a divorce decree had been entered, Frances McDonald commenced an independent action against her former husband, Kimber Ray Barlow. McDonald alleged that Barlow had fraudulently misrepresented during property settlement negotiations leading to the divorce the status and value of his interest in a trust...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases