1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 616 F.Supp.
  5. 616 F.Supp. 1134 (1985)
 

IN RE CONVERTIBLE ROWING EXERCISER PATENT LIT.

Civ. A. No. 85-119 MMS. Master File No. Misc. 85-14. MDL No. 623.

616 F.Supp. 1134 (1985)

In re CONVERTIBLE ROWING EXERCISER PATENT LITIGATION. DIVERSIFIED PRODUCTS CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WESLO DESIGN INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Utah Corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

July 23, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold J. Birch, and Alan I. Cantor, Banner, Birch, McKie & Beckett, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs.

Peter Sieglaff, Potter, Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, Del. (Thomas J. Rossa, Trask & Britt, Salt Lake City, Utah, of counsel), for defendant Weslo Intern., Inc.

Lyn M. Schlitt, Michael P. Mabile, and Jack M. Simmons, III, U.S. Intern. Trade Com'n, Washington, D.C., for U.S. Intern. Trade Com'n.

OPINION

MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

The question presented is whether an order should be entered staying or suspending an ongoing investigation by the United States International Trade Commission ("ITC") under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. § 1337 ("section 337"), by reason of parallel patent litigation in the district court. The investigation was initiated by a complaint filed with the ITC in December, 1984, by Diversified Products...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases