1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 698 P.2d
  5. 698 P.2d 1049 (1985)
 

STATE v. PETTIT

139,588, 146,611, 146,972; CA A32993 (Control), CA A32994, CA A32995.

698 P.2d 1049 (1985)

73 Or.App. 510

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Dan Linn PETTIT, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 1, 1985.

Reconsideration Denied May 31, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

David L. Runner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.

ROSSMAN, Judge.

Defendant appeals from a restitution order, contending that money he was paid for cocaine by police officers is not "pecuniary damages" within the meaning of ORS 137.103 and therefore cannot form the basis of the order. We affirm.

Defendant was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance,1 ORS 475.992(1), arising from his sale of cocaine to Salem police officers during the course of a criminal investigation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases