JUDAH v. SHANGHAI POWER CO.


494 A.2d 1244 (1985)

S.A. JUDAH and others similarly situated, Defendants Below, Appellants, v. SHANGHAI POWER COMPANY and Western District Power Company of Shanghai, Federal, Inc., U.S.A., Plaintiffs Below, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Decided: May 31, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Irving Morris (argued) and Kevin Gross, Morris and Rosenthal, P.A., Wilmington, and Eric W. Jorgensen, Stephen A. Million (argued) and Maurice Miller, of Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, San Francisco, California, of counsel, for defendants below, appellants.

R. Franklin Balotti and William J. Wade, Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, and Richard C. Allison, Stephen H. Kinney, Jr. (argued), Christopher Connolly, of Reid & Priest, New York, of counsel, and Donald Mitchell, of Shanghai Power Company, Boise, Idaho, of counsel, for plaintiffs below, appellees.

Before McNEILLY, MOORE and CHRISTIE, JJ.


MOORE, Justice.

In this class action the appellants are former preferred stockholders of a Delaware corporation, Shanghai Power Company (Shanghai), whose assets, and those of its wholly owned subsidiary, Western District Power Company (Western), also a Delaware corporation, were expropriated by the People's Republic of China in 1950.

Despite the rather convoluted factual and legal background of this litigation,1 the issue before...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases