Eugene LOWE and Margaret Lowe, h/w
v.
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION, Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, Raybestos Manhattan, Owens-Illinois, Celotex, Eagle-Picher, Keene Corporation, Nicolet Industries, Inc., Amatex, Pittsburgh-Corning, Unarco, Armstrong World, GAF Corporation, Fibreboard Corporation, Pacor, Inc., Porter Hayden, Forty Eight Insulations, Inc., Dar Industrial Products, Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Southern Textile Company, H.K. Porter Co.
United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 20, 1985.
March 20, 1985.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Lawrence D. Levin, Wyncote, Pa., Martin Greitzer, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs.
Robert St. Leger Goggin, Philadelphia, Pa., for Johns-Manville Corp. and Johns-Manville Sales Corp.
Arthur Makadon, Philadelphia, Pa., for Raybestos Manhattan.
Nathan A. Schachtman, Peter J. Lynch, Cherry Hill, N.J., for Owens-Illinois.
Thomas O. Malcolm, Edmund K. John, Andrew J. Trevelise, West Chester, Pa., for Celotex.
Victor L. Drexel, Norristown, Pa., Francis E. Shields, Philadelphia, Pa., for Amatex.
Edward J. David, Philadelphia, Pa., for Pittsburgh-Corning.
Dudley Hughes, Philadelphia, Pa., for Unarco.
Joseph M. O'Neill, Philadelphia, Pa., for Armstrong World.
Charles J. Kalinoski, Edward Greer, Philadelphia, Pa., for Gaf Corp.
Barbara Pennell, Joseph R. Thompson, Philadelphia, Pa., for Eagle-Picher.
John Ledwith, Leslie A. Miller, Francis G. Wenzel, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa., for Keene Corp.
Mark O. Denehy, Philadelphia, Pa., for Nicolet Industries, Inc.
Peter P. Liebert, III, Philadelphia, Pa., for Fibreboard Corp.
G. Daniel Bruch, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa., for Pacor, Inc.
John Patrick Kelley, Philadelphia, Pa., for Owens-Corning Fiberglas.
Joseph H. Foster, Philadelphia, Pa., for Southern Textile Co. and H.K. Porter Co.
United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.
OPINION
LUONGO, Chief Judge.
In this lawsuit, plaintiffs Joseph Eugene Lowe and James Albert Lowe ("plaintiffs") seek recovery as personal representatives of Eugene Lowe (Lowe) for injuries sustained by Lowe as a result of his occupational exposure to asbestos. The defendants have moved for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiffs' claims are barred by the statute of limitations. Because I conclude that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
