1000 FRIENDS OF OREGON v. L.C.D.C.

84-ACK-027; CA A31278.

698 P.2d 1027 (1985)

73 Or.App. 350

1000 FRIENDS OF OREGON, Petitioner, v. Land Conservation and Development Commission, and Curry County, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 1, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert L. Liberty, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner.

Jeffrey Bennett, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent Land Conservation and Development Commission. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem.

George B. Stevenson, County Counsel, Gold Beach, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent Curry County.

Before JOSEPH, C.J., and WARDEN and NEWMAN, JJ.


JOSEPH, Chief Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of LCDC's order acknowledging the Curry County comprehensive plan and land use regulations as complying with the statewide land use planning goals.1 We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Petitioner argues in its first assignment of error that the criteria set forth in the plan for the identification of "commitment" exception areas are in conflict...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases