LORD v. LAND CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT COMM.

84-ACK-027; CA A31371.

698 P.2d 1026 (1985)

73 Or.App. 359

Cynthia LORD, Petitioner, v. LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AND CURRY COUNTY, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 1, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cory Streisinger, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs were Robert C. Shoemaker, and Lindsay, Hart, Neil & Weigler, Portland.

Michael A. Holstun, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent Land Conservation and Development Commission. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, and Jeff Bennett, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem.

George B. Stevenson, County Counsel, Gold Beach, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent Curry County.

Before JOSEPH, C.J., and WARDEN and NEWMAN, JJ.


JOSEPH, Chief Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of LCDC's order acknowledging the Curry County comprehensive plan and land use regulations.1 She argues under her first assignment of error that LCDC erred by acknowledging the county's irrevocable commitment exceptions for five parcels2 located south of the Nesika Beach community. Petitioner contends, inter alia, that the county has not adequately explained...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases