1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 774 F.2d
  5. 774 F.2d 927 (1985)
 

ANDERSON v. AUROTEK

Nos. 84-3644, 84-3645.

774 F.2d 927 (1985)

Berge A. ANDERSON, et ux., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. AUROTEK, et al., Defendants, and Willard E. Matheson, Defendant-Appellant. Dr. Berge ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AUROTEK, et al., Defendants, and Lorraine J. Peters, surviving spouse and Personal Representative of James C. Peters, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided September 17, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher B. Wells, Lane, Powell, Moss & Miller, Seattle, Wash., and John G. Schultz, Leavy, Schultz & Sweeney, Pasco, Wash., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Douglas Branson, Professor of Law, University of Puget Sound School of Law, Tacoma, Wash., for defendants/defendants-appellants.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM

Defendants Matheson, Peters, and Rutledge formed a joint venture to exploit the Yosemite mining claim in Idaho, one of a number of claims owned by Mother Lode, a corporation. The three purchased 75% of Mother Lode's stock, and caused Mother Lode to transfer the mining claims to themselves as joint holders. They also informed Aurotek, a corporation, to develop the Yosemite claim, each taking one-third of its stock. Rutledge was to raise the necessary capital...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases