INGLESE v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COM'N

No. 84-2845.

768 F.2d 932 (1985)

Louis INGLESE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION; Carol M. Pavilack, Regional Commission North Central Region; and Thomas F. Keohane, Jr., Warden, United States Penitentiary, Terre Haute, Indiana, Respondents-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided July 26, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John L. Pollok, Hoffman, Pollok, Gasthalter, New York City, N.Y., for petitioner-appellant.

Gerald A. Coraz, Asst. U.S. Atty., Indianapolis, Ind., for respondents-appellees.

Before BAUER, CUDAHY, Circuit Judges, and FAIRCHILD, Senior Judge.


BAUER, Circuit Judge.

Louis Inglese, a federal prisoner, claims in a petition for a writ of habeas corpus that the application to him of parole guidelines promulgated subsequent to the commission of his crime violates the ex post facto clauses of the United States Constitution. The district court in the Southern District of Indiana denied the petition, holding that parole guidelines are not "laws" within the meaning of the ex post facto clause and that therefore the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases