AMFAC, INC. v. INGRAM

Nos. 82-06472; CA A31160.

694 P.2d 1005 (1985)

72 Or.App. 168

In the Matter of the Compensation of Arliss Ingram, Claimant. AMFAC, INC., Petitioner, v. Arliss INGRAM, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 6, 1985.

Reconsideration Denied March 22, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mildred J. Carmack, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief were William Replogle and Schwabe, Williamson, Wyatt, Moore & Roberts, Portland.

Kenneth D. Peterson, Jr., Hermiston, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and WARDEN and NEWMAN, JJ.


NEWMAN, Judge.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board that reversed the referee and held that petitioner's claim was compensable as an occupational disease. ORS 656.802. We reverse.

After not working for six years, claimant began to work at the employer's processing plant on February 1, 1982. She inspected potatoes on a conveyor and trimmed out defective portions. She handled about 16 potatoes per minute and made two or three...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases