WHITMAN v. INDUSTRIAL INDEMNITY CO.

83-00043, 83-00726; CA A32263.

697 P.2d 999 (1985)

73 Or.App. 73

In the Matter of the Compensation of Ray A. WHITMAN, Claimant. Ray A. Whitman, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent, v. INDUSTRIAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner, EBI Companies and Western Concrete Pumping, Respondents-Cross-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 3, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allen T. Murphy, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for petitioner-cross-respondent. With him on the brief was Richardson & Murphy, Portland.

Scott M. Kelley, Portland, argued the cause for respondent-cross-petitioner. With him on the brief was Cheney & Kelley, P.C., Portland.

Jerald P. Keene, Portland, argued the cause for respondents-cross-respondents. With him on the brief was Roberts, Reinisch & Klor, P.C., Portland.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.


VAN HOOMISSEN, Judge.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers' Compensation Board order that reversed a referee's order that assessed penalties and attorney fees against Industrial Indemnity for an unreasonable delay in accepting his claim. Industrial Indemnity cross-petitions from that part of the Board's order that affirmed the referee's order that claimant had incurred a new injury for which it is the responsible insurer. We review de novo.

At all relevant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases