1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 760 F.2d
  5. 760 F.2d 926 (1985)
 

KUNTZ v. REESE

No. 83-2151.

760 F.2d 926 (1985)

Richard P. KUNTZ, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Nat J. REESE, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided May 13, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. Bradford Huss, Hall, Henry, Oliver & McReavy, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Donn Dimichele, Brian C. Cuff, Ball, Hunt, Hart, Brown & Baerwitz, Los Angeles, Cal., Richard B. Glickman, Rosenman, Colin, Freund, Lewis & Cohen, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Before TANG and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges, and REAL, District Judge.

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

INTRODUCTION

This case presents four important questions regarding the scope and application of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1381 (1982).1 Plaintiffs-appellants, who are retired former employees of defendants-appellees, filed suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California and sought recovery for their employers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases