Per Curiam.
Respondent's objections to the board's findings and recommendation center on her contention that she has been denied due process because she was not given notice of the proceedings and an opportunity to defend. This argument is meritless. Respondent was given every opportunity to defend herself at the hearing before the board. Since the court remanded this case in June 1982, respondent was granted no less than five extensions of time or continuances...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
