DINSDALE v. YOUNG

CA A32510; SC S31805.

706 P.2d 944 (1985)

300 Or. 78

Sam DINSDALE, Respondent On Review, v. William H. YOUNG, Director of the Water Resources Department; and the Water Policy Review Board of the State of Oregon, Petitioners On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided October 1, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip Schradle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for petitioners on review. With him on the petition were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., and Michael D. Reynolds, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem.

Robert L. Nash, Bend, argued the cause for respondent on review.


LINDE, Judge.

The Ground Water Act of 1955, ORS 537.505 to 537.795, requires a permit from the Water Resources Director before one may appropriate underground water for large-scale uses such as irrigation. The statute contains provisions under which the director may close an area to further appropriations of ground water or take other protective steps if, after conducting a proceeding for the determination of a "critical ground water area," the director makes certain...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases