1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 704 P.2d
  5. 704 P.2d 940 (1985)
 

DOE V. v. ROE V.

No. 9992.

704 P.2d 940 (1985)

Jane DOE V, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Richard ROE V, Defendant-Appellant.

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii.

July 24, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward R. Lebb and Charles W. Totto, Honolulu (Ing and Lebb, of counsel), on the motion for petitioner-appellee.

Walter G. Chuck and Alexander T. MacLaren, Honolulu (Walter G. Chuck, Attorney at Law, A Law Corp., of counsel), for defendant-appellant.

Before BURNS, C.J., and HEEN and TANAKA, JJ.

TANAKA, Judge.

Petitioner-appellee (Petitioner) has moved to dismiss the appeal of defendant-appellant (Defendant). The motion raises an issue of first impression: Whether a family court's order adjudging Defendant to be the natural father of Petitioner's child but deferring for later determination child support and other subsidiary questions is an appealable final judgment. We answer no and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

On December 19, 1979...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases